"The pendency of writ petition would not be an impediment for the LG to take any decision," a bench headed by Chief Justice R M Lodha said while posting the matter before a five-judge Constitution bench for hearing on August 5.
"We are of the view that important constitutional question has been raised in the matter and needs to be heard by a five-judge Constitution bench," the bench, also comprising justices M B Lokur and Kurian Joseph said.
The new government at the Centre joined hands with the BJP to oppose the AAP's petition challenging the imposition of President's Rule in Delhi following the resignation of Arvind Kejriwal's 49-day minority government.
"What is the right of the minority government which has resigned for seeking relief? Once minority government resigns, no remedy is available to it and it cannot ask for dissolution of the Assembly," Additional Solicitor General P S Narasimha submitted while stressing that it was too early to demand for dissolution of the House and forcing election on people.
He said the country has already entered into the era of coalition politics and though the three main political groups here cannot see each other eye-to-eye, the possibility of some structural formation for government formation cannot be ruled out.
The submission of the Centre and the BJP came after senior advocate Fali S Nariman, appearing for AAP, said dissolution of Assembly was necessary, particularly in view of the changing scenario after the Lok Sabha elections after which the Congress categorically ruled itself out of supporting any political party for government formation.
