A bench, comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice U U Lalit, questioned the petitioner advocate about his "bonafide" and "locus" while asking searching questions as to how he was affected by central rule in the state.
"Do you belong to Uttarakhand? How are you concerned? You have to have some concern. What is your locus? Something should happen somewhere and Mr Sharma will file a PIL. Your credibility gets affected if you file such type of PILs.
The court's observation came as it heard a plea by advocate M L Sharma who sought a CBI probe into the alleged horse-trading of MLAs in the state.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
