SC refuses to interfere with appointment of acting DGP in Jammu and Kashmir

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 11 2018 | 5:25 PM IST

The Supreme Court Tuesday refused to interfere with the decision of the Jammu and Kashmir government to appoint an acting Director General of Police (DGP) last week.

The apex court was hearing a plea by the state government which has sought modification of the top court's order mandating that an acting police chief cannot be appointed and a regular DGP has to be appointed in consultation with the UPSC.

The state government had on September 6 appointed Dilbagh Singh as the acting police chief, replacing S P Vaid who was posted as the transport commissioner.

During the hearing today, Jammu and Kashmir government told the court that the appointment of acting DGP was an interim measure and the decision was taken in the wake of peculiar circumstances and the law and order situation.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud issued notice to Centre and sought the Attorney General's assistance on the issue.

Attorney General K K Venugopal, who was present in the courtroom, said the prohibition of appointing an acting DGP was introduced to prevent misuse of the two-year fixed tenure given in an earlier verdict of the apex court.

He claimed that several states were making appointments of DGPs on acting basis and confirming them on the eve of superannuation.

Advocate Shoeb Alam, appearing for Jammu and Kashmir, said the appointment of an acting DGP was purely an interim measure to tide over the peculiar situation till a regular appointment was made in consultation with UPSC.

"We cannot afford the police force to be without a chief," he said, citing the law and order situation in Jammu and Kashmir.

Alam said the process of consultation with the UPSC was initiated within 12 hours of transfer of the DGP Vaid.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for petitioner Prakash Singh, said the DGP cannot be removed without consultation with the state security commissioner.

He said it is gross misconduct as the acting DGP appointed by the government was number five in seniority and earlier suspended in a recruitment scam.

Alam said the appointment of acting DGP was merely an in-charge appointment and the UPSC has been consulted in the matter. "We will select from the panel cleared by the UPSC," Alam said.

The bench posted the matter for further hearing next week.

To avoid favouritism and nepotism, the apex court had on July 3 directed all states and Union Territories not to appoint any police officer as acting DGP and issued a slew of directions on police reforms.

The top court's direction had come on an application filed by the Centre in which it had claimed that certain states have been appointing acting DGPs and then making them permanent just before the date of their superannuation to enable them get the benefit of an additional two-year tenure till the age of 62 years.

The apex court, while deciding the PIL filed by two former DGPs Prakash Singh and N K Singh ion 2006, had issued several directions, including that state police chiefs will have a fixed tenure of two years. It had also directed setting up of a state security commission to ensure that the government does not exercise unwarranted influence on the police.

On September 7, the Jammu and Kashmir government had moved the apex court and sought modification of the July 3 order by which it was made mandatory for all states to send the list of three senior-most IPS officers to the UPSC for clearances before appointing a police officer as DGP.

The state government, in its plea, said: "It may be pointed out that in view of the complex security concerns of the state, the peculiar ground situation prevailing therein, the upcoming panchayat and local body elections, insurgent and terror related activities, the unique law and order requirements, it is essential to have a head of the police force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir at all times.

"As such, as a purely ad-interim measure, the State Government has been constrained to appoint the Director General, Prisons of State of Jammu and Kashmir, Dilbagh Singh... as the In-Charge Director General of Police till a regular arrangement is made.'"

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 11 2018 | 5:25 PM IST

Next Story