"It is a beautiful scheme. You just see the eligibility criteria. It is meant for the poor. We are sorry," a bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justices D Y Chandrachud and S K Kaul said.
The court was hearing an appeal filed through lawyer Vishnu Jain by 'Hindu Front for Justice' against the High Court order, passed on December 3, 2015, upholding the constitutional validity of the government order on the scheme.
"The G.O. Is challenged mainly on the ground that weaker section of the society is itself a class and same cannot be classified between majority and minority communities,"it said.
The pension scheme provided for an assistance of Rs 500 per month to those eligible, 25 per cent quota of which was reserved for members of the minority communities distinguished on the basis of religion, it said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
