SC takes note of 3,597 deaths due to pothole-related accidents in 2017

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 18 2018 | 5:35 PM IST

Taking note of almost 3,600 deaths reported last year alone due to potholes on roads across the country, the Supreme Court Tuesday said it was "unfortunate" that some states were disputing the data published by the Centre on such accidental deaths.

A bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta expressed "surprise" that the states were disputing the data provided by them to the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highway (MoRTH) on the ground that the figures were not verified by the transport departments of the respective states.

"We are surprised that state governments have disputed the data sent by them to the MoRTH," the bench said, adding "the views of the states are unfortunate".

The court noted in the order that it had earlier observed that the number of deaths in road accidents was more than the fatalities caused by terrorist attacks in India and the situation was "frightening".

In July, the apex court had taken cognizance of reports quoting official data showing that pothole-related accidents had claimed 3,597 lives in 2017, compared to 803 in all terror and extremist attacks that year.

The bench said it was also surprising that some states have said at a recent meeting convened by the Supreme Court Committee on Road Safety, headed by former top court judge Justice K S Radhakrishnan, that the funds allocated to them for maintenance of roads were inadequate.

It observed that since the states were constructing the roads, they were also obliged to maintain them.

"How can the states say that they cannot maintain the roads? Why they (states) are giving money to the contractors for roads if they have no money to maintain the roads? Will they demolish all the roads," the bench said.

"What are the states doing," it asked the counsel appearing for the ministry, while referring to the submissions by the states at the meeting about the data on deaths in accidents caused by potholes.

"Who is to maintain the roads? Are the people supposed to maintain them," the bench asked.

Advocate Gaurav Agrawal, assisting the court as an amicus curiae in the road safety matter, said the authorities do not see the "underlining problem" and no policy was discussed at the meeting on how to repair the potholes.

"There was no input in the meeting as to how to address the issue of potholes," the amicus said, adding that the issue of "blind spots", where accidents usually occur, would also have to be considered.

The amicus said the aspect of compensation to be paid in case of deaths in road accidents was also under consideration of the government and it has been said that a lump sum compensation of Rs five lakh would be given in such cases.

"Does this (compensation) also apply to the deaths in pothole accidents," the bench asked.

To this, the amicus said the issue of deaths due to potholes would be discussed.

During the hearing, the bench observed that the Supreme Court committee on road safety was doing a "good job" but the states were doing "nothing" in the matter.

It said that the meeting convened by the committee earlier this month was attended by representatives from the ministry, National Highways Authority of India and eight states.

The court granted time to the committee to submit a report on the issue of deaths caused due to potholes on roads and posted the matter for further hearing in the first week of November.

It said it expected the states to take up the matter with due seriousness and also consider the issue of compensation to be paid to the victims of accidents due to potholes on roads.

The top court had earlier too raised the issue of deaths in accidents due to potholes on roads, particularly in Mumbai. It had also said that according to reports, there were around 4,000 potholes in Mumbai.

"In Mumbai, people are dying due to potholes in roads and the officials are counting the potholes," the court had observed while hearing a matter relating to the sealing drive against unauthorised constructions in the national capital.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 18 2018 | 5:35 PM IST

Next Story