A bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice D Y Chandrachud was apprised of recent orders passed by the NGT with regard to the steps to be taken to clean the Yamuna.
"Having heard the counsel for rival parties and having perused the orders passed by the National Green Tribunal, we are of the view that there cannot be parallel jurisdictions to deal with the same issue," it said.
The court, however, said if NGT was confronted with any constitutional or legal issue which it cannot deal with, then Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, who is assisting the court as an amicus curiae, can file an application before it.
"In case the amicus curiae files any interim application, the registry is directed to proceed it before the court at the earliest," it said.
During the hearing, the apex court perused reports filed by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB) on the current status of construction of the Interceptor Sewer Project meant "to collect waste water flowing in three major drains, Najafgarh Drain, Supplementary Drain and Shahadra Drain".
The court took strong note of the contents of reports and said, "no time-line has been indicated as to by which time you (DJB) would complete them (water treatment plants). Primarily, you are saying you do not have the money".
The amicus curiae said, "the sum and substance is Yamuna is still 'maili' despite the fact that thousands of crore of rupees have been spent on it".
"Forget what has gone by. Let us see what can be done now. There is nothing in the report. It is just history," the bench said.
Earlier, the court had asked DJB to file reports giving details of functional and under-construction sewage plants for curbing release of untreated waste in Yamuna in the national capital.
The apex court had in 1994 taken suo motu (on its own) cognizance of a newspaper report 'And Quiet Flows Maili Yamuna' and initiated proceedings regarding its cleansing.
In 2012, it had expressed concern over the zero result achieved in nearly two decades while saying that over Rs 1,000 crore had been spent but the river was dirtier than before.
"Unfortunately, a huge amount has been spent without achieving any perceptible change in the water quality," the apex court had said.
"The governments must make a joint effort to stop discharge of industrial and domestic waste into the river directly. It is sad everyone is shifting responsibility," the court had said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
