Fadnavis said this hours after the Supreme Court rejected certain conditions like providing live CCTV footage to police on performances in dance bars and asked the Maharashtra government to grant licences to owners within 10 days after they comply with modified guidelines.
The chief minister also said the state government will approach the apex court with an alternative.
"State cannot permit obscenity it has seen in the past in dance bars. We will approach the Supreme Court with an alternative," he said, adding that the Maharashtra government is also contemplating a suitable legislation in the state Legislature over the issue.
However, the apex court's decision to grant licenses to dance bar owners within 10 days was welcomed by Indian Hotel And Restaurant Association (AHAR), while Opposition parties alleged a nexus between the government and bar owners.
"We welcome the SC's verdict. We always knew the court will do justice to our demands and we are thankful to the SC that it has enabled bar dancers to feed their children respectfully and have a life of their own," AHAR president Adarsh Shetty told PTI.
Shetty asserted that dance bar association members want to make the profession transparent, and expressed hope that the girls who resorted to prostitution after being out of profession would now be able to have a dignified life.
Meanwhile, MPCC spokesperson Sachin Sawant said the
government deliberately took a soft stand against dance bars.
"Maharashtra government has failed to put forth its position because they have a hidden nexus with dance bar owners," he alleged.
"This made them (government) take a soft stand against them (dance bar owners) in the Supreme Court. Also, the conditions put forth by the government were only a face-saver," he said.
"There is a deal between the dance bar association and the government. For 13 months between November 2013 and December 2014, they did not file an affidavit in the SC. They have failed to handle the issue properly. The CM always said he will not allow dance bars.
"We want to know if they would bring in a legislation on the issue, but we are sure they won't respect their deal with owners," NCP spokesperson Nawab Malik alleged.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
