Screening Committee for coal blocks has no legal basis: Parakh

However, he said SC's decision to cancel all allocations from 1993-2010 will have serious ramification on the economy

P C Parakh,
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 25 2014 | 7:24 PM IST
Former coal secretary P C Parakh today said the screening committee for allocation of coal blocks has no legal basis, but if the Supreme Court decides to cancel all blocks allocated from 1993-2010 it will have a "serious" ramification for the economy.

Parakh, who headed one such committee, said he had earlier flagged the issue with the suggestion of an amendment to the Coal Mine Nationalisation Act to bring in a fair and transparent bidding process.

In July 1992, the Coal Ministry had ordered setting up of a screening committee to consider proposals from private power companies for captive mining on first-cum-first-serve basis. Screening committee guidelines give preference to large projects of power and steel companies.

In all, 216 block were allocated between 1993 and 2010, out of which 24 were taken away at different points in time, leaving the total number of allocated blocks at 194.

The Supreme Court today said all coal block allocations from 1993 till 2010 before pre-auction era have been done in illegal manner and it suffered from "vice of arbitrariness" besides viewing that coal block allocation done by screening committee was not fair and transparent.

Parakh said: "I was expecting that Court will declare them to be illegal. From the beginning, I have also taken a view that screening committee has no legal basis and therefore, I had in 2004 itself, said that we must bring an amendment to the Coal Mine Nationalisation Act to bring in bidding system.

"That would have been the appropriate, legal system. The proposal was approved by the Prime Minister. However, for eight long years, it could not be implemented. The view that the court has taken today that screening committee has no legal basis, I think, is the right view."

He added however that cancelling all these allocations will have serious ramification on the Indian economy, its coal and power industries.

There is a need to set the procedure right for coal block allocation, Parakh said, adding that in its absence, India might end up importing more coal to its already existing big basket which would have a serious implication for the economy.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 25 2014 | 6:06 PM IST

Next Story