Sebi lets off TSR Darashaw with warning

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Apr 15 2015 | 6:22 PM IST
Capital market regulator Sebi has warned share transfer agent TSR Darashaw Ltd in a matter related to "fraudulent transfer" of shares of Tata Power, but the regulator stopped short of imposing a penalty.
While noting that TSR Darashaw had "failed to act with due skill, diligence and care" with respect to transfer of certain number of Tata Power shares, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) said that Share Transfer Agents (STA) norms "cannot be taken in a retrospective manner".
However, the order "does not preclude Sebi from taking any further action, as deemed fit, in accordance with law against them noticee viz, TSR Darashaw Ltd," the regulator said.
It was alleged that B Hemalatha, a client of TSR Darashaw, had executed a Power of Attorney (PoA) in December 1991 in favour of her father J P Balasubramaniam.
Hemalatha, who held shares of Tata Power, expired in December 1995 and in June 1996 her father forwarded the PoA to TSR Darashaw for registration.
TSR Darashaw had received 'transfer form' signed by the father for 1,900 shares of Tata Power on February 14, 2002 and had executed the transfer of shares to one Anil Kumar Bhootra on February 20, 2002.
However, it was alleged by the father that TSR Darashaw did not obtain transferor's confirmation at the time when it received 'transfer form' for transfer of 1,900 shares to Bhootra.
"It is noted from the documents and evidence available that the noticee (TSR Darashaw) was very well aware of the demise of its shareholder Hemalatha and inspite of the same the noticee transferred shares of Tata Power Company Ltd (TPCL) to Bhootra within a short period of 6 days from the date of receipt of transfer form by the noticee," Sebi said in an order dated April 13.
"...In February 2002, when the noticee received request for transfer of shares of TPCL from Bhootra, noticee transferred the shares of TPCL to Bhootra without seeking any confirmation from father/seller confirmation," it added.
However, it was submitted by TSR Darashaw that Hemalatha's father had made a complaint to Sebi with respect to same matter in May 2003, which was closed by Sebi in that year itself. It had also submitted that the STA norms are not retrospective in nature.
Agreeing with these submissions made by TSR Darashaw, Sebi said that "no penalty is levied on the noticee...In the present adjudication proceeding".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 15 2015 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story