Sentencing should be stern, wrong acquittal of accused sends wrong signal to society, says court

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 23 2019 | 8:00 PM IST

The sentencing process of convicts should be stern as wrong a acquittal will send a wrong signal to the society, observed a Delhi court, while sentencing a man to 16 months in prison for attacking a woman.

Additional Sessions Judge Satinder Kumar Gautam said the principle that no innocent man should be punished is equally applicable to no guilty man being allowed to go unpunished. He added that the courts, while awarding sentences, are expected to operate in such a way that it reflects the conscience of the society.

The court's observations came while sentencing a man to 16 months in prison with a fine of Rs 15,000 for restraining and attacking a 22-year-old woman in August last year.

The court said wrong acquittals had chain reactions and would ultimately result in people losing confidence in rule of law.

"Wrong acquittal of the accused will send a wrong signal to the society. Wrong acquittal has its chain reactions, the law breakers would continue to break the law with impunity people then would lose confidence in criminal justice system and would tend to settle their score on the street by exercising muscle power and if such situation is allowed to happen, woe would be the Rule of Law," the court observed.

The court further said that criminal justice system must be alive to the expectation of people.

"It is also admitted position of law that it must be borne in mind that criminal justice system must be alive to the expectation of the people. The principle that no innocent man should be punished is equally applicable that no guilty man should be allowed to go unpunished," it further observed.

On August 18 last year, the woman was returning to her home in West Vinod Nagar when she was attacked by Sonu Kumar on her face with a sharp object.

The court sent Kumar to 16 months in prison under Section 506 (criminal intimidation), 341 (wrongful restraint) and 325 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt) of the Indian Penal Code.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 23 2019 | 8:00 PM IST

Next Story