As the infighting between the CBI chief and his deputy turned ugly, sources in the agency Saturday said Central Vigilance Commission will have to clarify if allegations against CBI Director Alok Verma should be construed as against the institution that he is heading.
The comments came a day after a candid press statement from the CBI gave details of response submitted by the agency to the CVC which is inquiring into complaint against Verma, a 1979-batch AGMUT cadre IPS officer.
The complaint has been filed by agency's second-in-command Rakesh Asthana and it has been referred to the CVC by the government.
The agency had claimed that the CVC had sought some files on the ongoing cases from it through letters dated September 11 and September 14 but did not give the reasons behind it.
After the complaint was reported in the media, the agency issued a tell all press statement Friday in which it not only termed the allegations against its chief as "frivolous and malicious" but also said that role of complainant (Asthana) was under investigation in "at least half-a-dozen case".
The CBI sources said Saturday the agency director was misappropriating the resources, both human and financial, of the institution to contest a case of his "official malfeasance".
"It is a clear case of criminal breach of trust and abuse of official position... Moreover how can someone be a judge of his own case. It is a serious issue of conflict of interest," a CBI source in the know of development said.
He said the CVC must clarify whether Verma is the institution called the CBI or an individual officer holding the post of director of the institution called the CBI.
"Also, whether the allegations of official misdemeanour against Alok Verma can be construed as allegation the institution CBI?" he said.
The complaint reportedly alleged that Verma had discontinued searches in the IRCTC scam involving former railway minister Lalu Prasad at the last moment.
The CBI press statement had said Friday, "The allegation of preventing raids against the accused in the IRCTC case is absolutely false. The investigation of the case has resulted in filing a chargesheet before the designated court. This could not have been possible without the explicit approval of the Director CBI."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
