The SIT headed by Justice M B Shah (retd), in an August 11 letter to the RBI governor, impressed upon need to establish an institutional mechanism for sharing of data and stressed on effective sharing of information between various government departments.
"Chairman SIT has asked RBI for an institutional mechanism for sharing of data in its various databases with the enforcement authorities," a Finance Ministry tweet said today.
It has asked banking regulator RBI to develop an institutional mechanism to track illicit financial flows out of the country.
The SIT feels that the data can be shared only by having one agency such as Central Economic Intelligence Bureau (CEIB) or any other agency, as a data warehouse.
"From the said data warehouse, various agencies can gather the relevant information for taking early appropriate action," the SIT said.
It said since the data would be available with one agency, it can be relevant to action expected to be taken by other law enforcement agencies.
At present, RBI holds the information with respect to all types of foreign exchange transactions under various categories.
to data relating to foreign exchange transactions of all authorised dealers with authorities like enforcement directorate and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence.
Foreign Exchange Transactions Electronic Reporting System (FET-ERS), which holds the said data should capture the PAN number of the importer or exporter and that RBI should take necessary steps to get this done on an "urgent basis".
As regards Exports Outstanding data, the SIT said huge amounts were found outstanding beyond a period of one year in violation of FEMA.
The SIT had noted that the possibility of the concerned companies having wrongly claimed duty drawback also cannot be ruled out. Further, the possibility of the concerned Companies having availed of various export promotion schemes also cannot be ruled out.
RBI maintains export realisation data in its EDPMS database.
The SIT in his letter has also observed that it is important to co-relate shipping bills with confirmation from banks on the EDPMS database itself rather than Bank Realisation Certificate (BRC) which is different database and that RBI may impress upon the banks to inform regarding realisation of export proceeds on the EDPMS itself.
With regard to 'monitoring of Advance Remittances against Imports', the SIT in wake of the Bank of Baroda scam, the SIT had asked RBI to institutionalise a mechanism for cross checking of advance remittances against Bill of Entry irrespective of value of advance remittances sent.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
