According to sources, during an in-camera proceeding, District Judge Amarnath sent accused Mohd Azeemusan, Mohd Osama, Akhlaq ur-Rehman, Meeraj, Mohsin Ibrahim Sayyed and Mohd Mustaq Seikh to NIA custody on the agency's plea which said probe into the case, which has been transferred to it from Delhi Police, was at a crucial stage.
The sources said National Investigation Agency (NIA) told the court that in order to unearth larger conspiracy of ISIS, further custodial interrogation of these accused, who were in judicial custody, was required.
In its remand application, the NIA said, "The accused are likely to be confronted with the accused of another case being handled by the NIA and with the certain incriminating points which have been cropped up recently in the instant case."
"The arrested accused are to be taken to the various scene of crimes in order to know the facts and circumstances of hatched criminal conspiracy, more information is likely to be gathered in this regard," it said.
more relevant questionnaire regarding photos, audio, videos and miscellaneous data received by the forensic experts.
The NIA submitted before the court that during the course of investigation, larger conspiracy of ISIS activities in India and abroad including recruitment of resident and non- resident Indians by the outfit was yet to be ascertain.
It also informed the court that during the custodial probe conducted by the Delhi Police, certain names, codes and mobile numbers of some active members and motivator of ISIS, were disclosed by them.
These members were involved in furtherance of activities of their ideologies using Internet-based communications like Facebook, Skype and other platforms to lure youths in joining the proscribed terrorist organisation, it claimed.
"During the course of investigation, Delhi Police had seized mobile phone sets, SIMs, laptops and micro SD card from the accused which have been sent for forensic analysis and the results are still awaited," the NIA said.
The Delhi Police's Special Cell had registered the FIR in January under the sections of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of IPC. Later the case was transferred to the NIA and a fresh FIR was registered.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
