"Whoever hurled slipper at CM, it was a wrong thing and cannot be justified at any cost. We cannot support such a person," Modi told reporters after his weekly janata darbar at his residence here.
Modi, who served as Nitish's deputy during the NDA regime in the state, said the person, who flung slipper at CM, had also come to his janata darbar last week.
There too he tried to create a scene but security personnel caught him, he said.
The photo journalists could not record the incident and Kumar told reporters the slipper struck him on the right side of his chest. He also showed the imprint of the slipper on his white kurta.
To a query on Nitish Kumar's merger plan with Ajit Singh's party Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD) to strengthen his position at national level, Modi said neither JD(U) president Nitish Kumar nor RJD boss Lalu Prasad has stature and political influence beyond Bihar.
On JD(U)'s attempt to either go for merger or have a broader alliance with like minded parties, Sushil Modi said, it is difficult to say who will side with whom.
Kumar first tried a merger of old Janata parivar under Mulayam Singh Yadav but he 'ditched' and now Ajit Singh who, as per newspapers' reports, is not taking interest, he said.
The district administration has lodged an FIR against four
persons, including Saumendra Singh, whose wife lost the last panchayat election for Mukhiya post to Sen's wife Madhumita Singh.
Saumendra Singh was arrested despite the authorities having not recovered any bottle from his house while four empty bottles were found from adjacent plot of Singh's house, Modi claimed.
He alleged that Excise Department Superintendent Ram Babu Prasad, four sub-inspectors, including Deepak Kumar Singh, who had conducted the raid, and two homeguard jawans were quizzed by Deep Nagar police for 10 hours to know from where and how they had received the information about liquor kept in JD(U) leader's house.
He wondered why police wanted to know the name of the informer from the Excise department officials whereas, as per the Excise Act, the name of the informer has to be withheld as no one would come forward to share any information due to the fear of being arrested.
If there was any connivance of Excise department officials in planting liquor bottles in JD(U) leader's house then why not any Excise official was apprehended so far, he asked.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
