Concussions usually occur after a blow to the head - for example, during sports or a car accident. They can result in such symptoms as headache, nausea, confusion, amnesia or lack of consciousness.
Researchers measured the levels of microRNAs - tiny snippets of non coding RNA - in the saliva of concussion patients.
They found that the presence of certain microRNAs in saliva was able to better identify concussions and more accurately predict the length of concussion symptoms than relying solely on patient surveys.
"There's been a big push recently to find more objective markers that a concussion has occurred, instead of relying simply on patient surveys," Hicks said.
"Previous research has focused on proteins, but this approach is limited because proteins have a hard time crossing the blood-brain barrier. What's novel about this study is we looked at microRNAs instead of proteins, and we decided to look in saliva rather than blood," he said.
Patients are usually advised to rest and stay away from such physical activity as sports or gym class until their symptoms subside.
Hicks said that while it is important to give the brain enough time to heal, it is difficult to accurately predict how long patients should rest.
The researchers followed 52 concussion patients between the ages of 7 and 21 for the study.
Each participant was evaluated using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT-3) - a common tool that doctors use to inventory concussion symptoms and severity - within two weeks of their injury.
In the study, they also collected saliva from each participant and analysed for levels of different microRNAs.
They then compared the microRNA profiles to the patient's symptoms at both the initial and follow-up assessments.
The researchers isolated five microRNAs that could accurately identify the participants who would experience prolonged symptoms.
These microRNAs could correctly identify if a participant would have prolonged symptoms or not.
"The microRNAs were able to predict whether symptoms would last beyond four weeks with about 85 percent accuracy," Hicks said.
"In comparison, using the SCAT-3 report of symptoms alone is about 64 per cent accurate. If you just go off the parent's report of symptoms, it goes down to the mid-50s. In this pilot study, these molecular signatures are outperforming survey tools," he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
