Social activist seeks direction to refer his complaint to HC

Image
Press Trust of India Bangalore
Last Updated : Feb 26 2013 | 11:20 PM IST
A social activist today filed an application before the Lokayukta court, seeking a direction to refer his complaint alleging irregularities in the Bangalore- Mysore Expressway Project, to the High Court on certain clarifications on points of law.
T J Abraham's private complaint pertains to alleged corruption and illegalities in Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor project, awarded to Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprise (NICE) and its sister companies.
In his application, Abraham, also an entrepreneur, contended that his complaint was filed on July 18, last year seeking a direction from Lokayukta court to Lokayukta police to investigate certain 'offences' committed in the course of inception, execution and implementation of the project.
On October 25 last year, the Lokayukta court had directed the Additional DGP(Lokayukta), to investigate the alleged offences.
But the court in its order stated it would not take cognisance of any of the offences alleged.
Under similar circumstances the Karnataka High Court had held in the B V Acharya vs Venkateshaiah case that even in order to direct investigation by Lokyukta police under 156(3) CrPC, sanction of the government is required.
By applying this principle of law, the High Court has stayed almost all cases in which Lokayukta police was directed to investigate.
This procedure, according to counsel for the complainant K V Dhananjay "is unknown to the law and is grossly opposed numerous judgements delivered by the Supreme Court.
He contended that if the special judge were to abide by the B V Acharya judgement, he would have to disregard hundreds of Apex Court judgements which has stated that no sanction whatsoever is required to investigate a public servant.
Dhananjay said the High court should clarify this contradiction and the Special Judge should refer the matter to it for clarification on point of law.
Lokayukta court judge N K Sudhindra Rao posted the application to tomorrow for orders.
On January 29, the Dharwad bench of Karnataka High Court had extended its stay on the Lokayukta order in the complaint till final disposal of the case.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 26 2013 | 11:20 PM IST

Next Story