"In the India-Pakistan conflict, the stakes are higher than ever," said Stratfor - an intelligence analysis group and think tank - in its latest analysis.
Nuclear risks will grow significantly in the event of another confrontation, wrote Michael Krepon of the Stimson Center in his latest op-ed.
"Pakistan's military leaders seem unpersuaded by arguments that mixing tactical nuclear weapons into conventional battle plans is a lousy idea," he wrote ahead of his visit to Pakistan soon.
"The stakes are now much higher in any potential Indo-Pakistani conflict," Stratfor wrote in its analysis, which is widely read in the government circles.
"The most dangerous scenario that could lead to catastrophe is a replay of the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks," wrote Lieutenant General (rtd) David W Barno and Dr Nora Bensahel from the American University in a joint op-ed in 'War on the Rocks'.
Arguing that the US should also out to current (and former) civil and military decision-makers on both sides to develop and grow bilateral relationships that could prove vital in the next crisis, the two said a nuclear war between India and Pakistan would dramatically alter the world as we know it.
"The damage from fallout and blast, the deaths of potentially millions, and the environmental devastation of even a few weapons detonations would suddenly dwarf any other global problem," they wrote.
"A civilian prime minister in Pakistan cannot take the lead is dispute resolution, but might be able to follow Modi's lead - if the costs to Pakistan of rejecting a fair plan and the incentives to accept it are meaningful," he said.
Stratfor said Indian and Pakistani military doctrines that evolved over the past decade will greatly raise the stakes in any future Indo-Pakistani conflict.
Introducing battlefield nuclear weapons will lower the threshold of nuclear weapons use while raising the possibility of a full nuclear exchange on the Indian subcontinent, it added.
