JVL is at least the eighth firm against which the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has ordered a forensic audit.
In an interim order dated September 14, Sebi said that BSE should appoint an independent forensic auditor to verify misrepresentation including of financials and business of JVL and misuse of the books of accounts and funds including facilitation of accommodation entries, if any.
"The recoverability of loans and existence of investment made by JVL are in serious question," Sebi said, adding that failure of the company to produce supporting documents to substantiate the transactions entered into by it leads to further evidence of misrepresentation of financials.
"Thus, there is prima facie evidence of misrepresentation of business/financials as well as of misuse of funds/the books of accounts of the company," Sebi said.
Noting that the directors and key management persons of JVL have prima facie failed to discharge their fiduciary responsibility, the regulator said that it is imperative that in the interest of investors, the financials of the company be independently audited to establish their genuineness.
The promoters and directors of JVL have been permitted by Sebi only to buy the securities of the firm.
Easing the trading curbs on the firm, Sebi noted that dealing in securities of JVL should be reverted to the status as it stood prior to issuance of letter dated August 7 by Sebi.
JVL is among the firms against whom Sebi initiated action on August 7 by ordering trading restrictions, following receipt of a list of 331 'suspected shell companies' from the government.
While the curbs were imposed on the 331 firms from August 8 onwards, they were eased with regard to some companies following appeals against the ruling.
Sebi's move came after it received the list of 331 suspected shell companies from the government on June 9 and was asked to initiate necessary action.
The regulator found that the companies identified as shell companies were potentially involved in misrepresentation including of their financials and business in violation of listing regulations.
The regulator said it was of the view that they were possibly misusing the books of accounts and funds, including by facilitating "accommodation entries to the detriment of minority shareholders".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
