Take action against those responsible for rallies: BCI

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jun 08 2016 | 12:57 AM IST
Taking a serious view of the June 6 rally taken out by Advocates Associations of Madras High Court here in protest against amendments to existing rules under the Advocates Act, Bar Council of India today instructed the State Bar Council to initiate action against those responsible.
Blaming the Bar leaders for not putting forth their views at meetings held in connection with the framing of rules, BCI chairman Mannan Kumar Mishra, however, said he was also opposed to certain rules framed by High Court.
If the advocates had any grievances, they could have written to the Bar Council, he said.
Stating that the bar leaders may have to sit together to resolve the issues, Mishra said he is worried about the situation in Tamil Nadu, where "despite repeated suspensions, the lawyers are still resorting to the old ways."
Referring to boycott of courts by lawyers in some districts against the new set of rules, he said he had instructed the State Bar Council to initiate tough action against the perpetrators of indiscipline in the bar.
While stating again that BCI was also opposed to certain rules, Mishra who spoke over phone from Delhi, said "You cannot punish without a show cause notice or an opportunity of being heard."
All these matters can be resolved by sitting together, he said, adding that Madras High Court Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul had already clarified that if lawyers submitted their suggestions,he would forward them to the rules committee for consideration.
The advocates associations had yesterday requested the CJ to interfere and withdraw the amendments. They protested the new set of disciplinary rules framed by the Court as per the Supreme Court verdict in the R K Anand case of 2009.
They alleged that there had been no transparent and fair consultation with the Bar across the state before framing such rules and demanded that the amended rules be withdrawn unconditionally as it put their profession in peril.
In a resolution, it had requested the Chief Justice to call for a dialogue between Bar and Bench and evolve mechanisms to identify key issues hampering effective functioning of the Judicial Institution and prepare both short and long-term plans and program to amicably settle all the issues.
On May 25, the High Court had issued a notification making amendments to existing rules under the Act with a view to ensure peaceful conduct of court proceedings and suggesting disciplinary action against erring advocates.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 08 2016 | 12:57 AM IST

Next Story