Researchers from University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) told 32 teenagers, aged 13-18 years that they were participating in a small social network similar to the popular photo-sharing app, Instagram.
In an experiment, researchers showed them 148 photographs on a computer screen for 12 minutes, including 40 photos that each teenager submitted, and analysed their brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
"When the teens saw their own photos with a large number of likes, we saw activity across a wide variety of regions in the brain," said Lauren Sherman from UCLA.
A region that was especially active is a part of the striatum called the nucleus accumbens, which is part of the brain's reward circuitry, she said.
This reward circuitry is thought to be particularly sensitive during adolescence.
When the teenagers saw their photos with a large number of likes, researchers also observed activation in regions that are known as the social brain and regions linked to visual attention.
"We showed the exact same photo with a lot of likes to half of the teens and to the other half with just a few likes. When they saw a photo with more likes, they were significantly more likely to like it themselves," said Sherman.
Teens react differently to information when they believe it has been endorsed by many or few of their peers, even if these peers are strangers, researchers said.
"In the study, this was a group of virtual strangers to them, and yet they were still responding to peer influence; their willingness to conform manifested itself both at the brain level and in what they chose to like," said Mirella Dapretto from UCLA.
The teenagers in the study viewed "neutral" photos - which included pictures of food and of friends - and "risky" photos - including of cigarettes, alcohol and teenagers wearing provocative clothing.
"For all three types of photographs - neutral, risky and even their own - the teens were more likely to click like if more people had liked them than if fewer people liked them," said Patricia Greenfield from UCLA.
The findings were published in the journal Psychological Science.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
