TESO to move SC against 1974 agreement on Katchatheevu

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Apr 15 2013 | 10:15 PM IST
Holding that there was no legislation for ceding Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka in 1974, DMK-backed TESO today said it would move the Supreme Court against the agreement.
The TESO meeting, headed by DMK president M Karunanidhi adopted a resolution in this regard, saying the islet was ceded by India to Sri Lanka despite the then DMK Government's opposition.
TESO pointed out that whenever a part of the country has to be ceded to another nation, it has to be done through a legislation after getting nod of both Houses of Parliament.
"As far as Katchatheevu is concerned, no such legislation was enacted. And it is true that ceding is not constitutionally valid since the islet was ceded to Sri Lanka by way of an agreement. Therefore, it has been decided to move the Supreme Court on behalf of TESO to cancel the 1974 agreement and declare Katchatheevu is part of India," the resolution said.
Chief Minister Jayalalithaa as opposition leader in 2008 had moved the apex court against the agreement, with the revenue department impleading in the case after AIADMK came to power.
TESO said the 1974 agreement had allowed traditional fishing rights for fishermen of both countries and both India and Sri Lanka could not prevent fishermen of either nation from fishing in Katchatheevu.
However, contrary to the agreement Sri Lanka was preventing Tamil Nadu fishermen from fishing there besides damaging their fishing nets and arresting them, it said.
It said the agreement was signed despite the then DMK government's strong opposition which had sought minimum requirements like fishing rights and participation in a church function in the islet by Indian fishermen. But these provisions were removed during the Emergency, it said.
Holding that the Centre is duty bound to protect the fishermen, the resolution said almost 600 Indian fishermen had been killed so far by the Sri Lankan Navy.
The resolution said it is accepted the world over there cannot be a maritime boundary to prevent fishing rights.
It voiced concern over increased instances attacks on Indian fishermen by the Lankan Navy and said government in March had asked the Centre to initiate diplomatic steps to check it and urged for withdrawal of the 1974 agreement ceding Katchatheevu islet to the island nation.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 15 2013 | 10:15 PM IST

Next Story