The findings suggest that people are willing to take these risks because they view God as providing security against potential negative outcomes.
"References to God pervade daily life - on any given day you might see the word 'God' printed on US currency, drive behind a car with a bumper sticker that references God, or use one of the many colloquial expressions that use the word 'God'," said lead researcher Daniella Kupor of Stanford University Graduate School of Business.
"In fact, the word 'God' is one of the most common nouns in the English language," Kupor said.
The researchers hypothesised that thinking about God may have a different effect in relation to risks that have no moral connotation, since people tend to view God as a source of protection and security.
In a group of online survey studies with nearly 900 participants, the researchers found that people who were reminded of God - either by working on word scrambles that included God-related words or by reading a paragraph about God - were more willing to engage in various risky behaviours than those participants who were not prompted to think about God.
There were ads that promoted an immoral risk ("Learn how to bribe"), ads that promoted a nonmoral risk ("Find skydiving near you"), and ads that promoted no risk ("Find amazing video games").
In some cases, the ads included a mention of God (eg, "God knows what you're missing! Find skydiving near you.")
The findings were clear: When the ad included a reference to God, people clicked on the skydiving (nonmoral risk) ad more often, but they clicked on the bribing (moral risk) less often. People clicked about the same number of times on the computer games ad, with or without a mention of God.
Additional findings indicated that people who were reminded of God perceived less danger in various risky behaviours than participants who were not reminded of God.
They reported more negative feelings toward God when they lost their potential winnings in a risk-related game, suggesting that they had expected God to protect them from losing the money and were disappointed in the outcome.
The study is published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
