Top cops killed in 26/11 as they did not have proper arms: HC

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 25 2014 | 7:40 PM IST
Advising the Maharashtra Government to revise its weapon policy every three years, the Bombay High Court today observed that high ranking police officers lost their lives during the brazen 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks because the arms they possessed were not appropriate.
The observation was made by a division bench on the eve of the sixth anniversary of the terror attacks, which claimed 164 lives and injured several people.
Justices V M Kanade and Anuja Prabhudesai lamented that though the Government was required to revise its policy on acquiring weapons every three years, this had not been done since 2010.
"Top police officers were killed during the 26/11 strikes as the weapons they used were not good," the judges remarked.
The bench directed the Government to immediately form a special committee to be headed by the Director General of Police (DGP) so that the weapon policy was revised on a regular basis, more particularly for the police personnel attached to the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS).
"It is most unfortunate that the 2010 policy has not been revised, in spite of various incidents of bomb blasts having taken place after the Mumbai terror attacks," said the bench, while hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Pune resident Ashwini Rane.
Public prosecutor Sandeep Shinde submitted to the court various Government Resolutions issued in regard to weapons to be provided to different ranks of police officers. He said there was a provision to revise the policy every three years.
The court also directed the Government to revise the monetary benefits given to policemen by way of allowances and incentives. This would help in motivating them in their job.
The direction from the bench came after petitioner's counsel Anil Anturkar submitted that as per the policy, Rs 250 is given as dearness allowance per month to a policeman, which works out to about Rs 8 per day.
"With such a meagre amount, a policeman would not even be able to eat a wada-pav (a popular snack in Maharashtra)," Anturkar quipped.
Being in agreement with the argument advanced by the counsel, the judges remarked, "Generally, in several matters we pass strictures against policemen for not performing their duties, but if the State does not take care of them (police), then we cannot expect a better service from police...At least basic facilities should be provided."
Top police officers Hemant Karkare, Vijay Salaskar, Ashok Kamte and others laid down their lives during the Mumbai terror attacks.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 25 2014 | 7:40 PM IST

Next Story