Triple talaq: Initial confusion over SC verdict

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 22 2017 | 6:57 PM IST
Confusion prevailed in Supreme Court today as the verdict on the triple talaq issue was pronounced by a five-judge constitution bench, with many of those attending the hearing getting the first impression that it was a unanimous verdict.
As Chief Justice J S Khehar, heading the five-judge constitution bench, read out the operating portion and concluded by using the word "we...", several journalists rushed out of the courtroom to break the news to the world, assuming that the CJI has delivered the verdict for the entire bench.
However, the turnaround began when Justice Kurian Joseph started reading out the operative part of his judgement and expressely disagreed with the findings spelt out by the CJI minutes ago. The CJI had penned the 275-page minority verdict for himself and Justice S Abdul Nazeer.
Soon after Justice Joseph finished reading, the third senior-most judge at the bench, Justice R F Nariman, read out the operative portion of his judgement and refusing to agree with the views expressed by Chief Justice.
The last and the most important line he said was that Justice U U Lalit has agreed with his views.
The impression that the judgement weighed in favour of the views expressed by Chief Justice and Justice S Abdul Nazeer suddenly changed then, as it became clear that the views expressed by Justices Joseph, Nariman and Lalit were that of the majority.
As soon as Justice Nariman spoke the last line that Justice Lalit has agreed with his views, the CJI went into a huddle with Justice Nariman.
Chatter among the lawyers started inside the packed CJI's courtroom that the views expressed by Chief Justice and Justice Nazeer have been reduced to a minority.
Thereafter, Chief Justice signed the verdict and read out the one-line order of court, saying "In view of the different opinions recorded, by a majority of 3:2 the practice of 'talaq-e-biddat' - triple talaq is set aside".
The final outcome indicating a dissenting verdict led journalists, who had by then already given their 'breaking news', to rush out again for course correction and say that the practice of triple talaq has been struck down by a 3:2 verdict.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 22 2017 | 6:57 PM IST

Next Story