Additional Sessions Judge Vikash Dhull let off the two south Delhi residents of charges committed under sections of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and IPC as neither the 17-year-old girl nor her parents testified that she had been raped by the two youths.
The court also said that since the alleged offence took place in the year 2010-2012 and the FIR was registered in September 2013, it makes the case "highly untrustworthy, unbelievable and open to manipulation and concoction."
It also noted that the girl had deposed that her signatures were obtained on blank papers by police and the statement given by her before a magistrate was on the behest of police officials and not voluntary.
The prosecution had alleged that one of the accused had raped her in 2010 after giving her an intoxicating substance in a soft drink, while the other accused had raped her in 2012.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
