UK entering WWI was 'biggest error': Historian Ferguson

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Feb 08 2014 | 5:54 PM IST
Britain could have stayed out of World War I and lived with a German victory in the conflict, a leading historian has said, describing British intervention as "the biggest error in modern history."
Niall Ferguson said there had been no immediate threat to Britain. It could have faced Germany at a later date on its own terms, rather than rushing in unprepared, which led to catastrophic costs, he said.
"Britain could indeed have lived with a German victory. What's more, it would have been in Britain's interests to stay out in 1914," he said in an interview with BBC History Magazine.
He wondered why Britain intervened on land so early, when it was quite unprepared for the fighting.
"Creating an army more or less from scratch and then sending it into combat against the Germans was a recipe for disastrous losses," he said.
Wondering whether this was the best way for Britain to deal with the challenge posed by imperial Germany, Ferguson said: "My answer is no."
Even if Germany had defeated France and Russia, it would have had a massive challenge to run the new German-dominated Europe and would have remained significantly weaker than the British empire in naval and financial terms, he noted.
Given the resources that Britain had in 1914, a better strategy would have been to wait and deal with the German challenge later when it could respond on its own terms, taking advantage of its greater naval and financial capability, he added.
Ferguson, the Laurence A Tisch professor of history at Harvard University, rejected the argument that Britain was forced to act in 1914 to secure its borders and Channel ports.
"This argument, which is very seductive, has one massive flaw in it, which is that Britain tolerated exactly that situation happening when Napoleon overran the European continent, and did not immediately send land forces to Europe," he remarked.
"It wasn't until the peninsular war that Britain actually deployed ground forces against Napoleon. So strategically, if Britain had not gone to war in 1914, it would still have had the option to intervene later, just as it had the option to intervene after the revolutionary wars had been under way for some time."
Ferguson's comments came after Education Secretary Michael Gove criticised leftwing academics for their take on Britain's role in the conflict and doubting if UK's role in the war should be seen as heroic courage or monumental error.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 08 2014 | 5:54 PM IST

Next Story