The House of Commons' Home Affairs Select Committee, chaired by Indian-origin Labour MP Keith Vaz, had launched the inquiry into the UK Home Office response to the cheating scandal back in April.
In its report released on Friday, the committee concluded that the issue requires a morefuller inquiry into the scandal, which involved hundreds of dawn raids by UK Border Agency officers andresulted in thedeportationof around 48,000 internationalstudents, nearly 70 per cent of whom were Indian, during the course of 2014.
He further said: "The Home Office appears not to have investigated English language testing fraud allegationsthemselvesbefore undertaking heavy-handed action. Recent legal cases, with their damming criticisms from senior judges, have opened the door to a mass of expensive and damaging litigation".
"An estimated 70 per cent of those affected are of Indian nationality, and this debacle comes at a time when Indian student numbers in the UK are declining. The UK risks causing extensive damage to its reputation as a leading destination for international study."
The cheating scam was uncovered by a
'BBCPanorama'investigation in February 2014. It found that immigration consultancies and international education agencies were charging fees to help internationalstudentswith poor English get around tests required forstudentvisas and visa extensions.
An ensuing investigation by the Home Office claimed widespread problems with the test system, leading to revocation of licenses of nearly 100 institutions and triggering the removal of students who had been tested there.
"These issues include procurement and licensing,
investigations, inspections and how much money has been spent. As a starting point to this inquiry the Home Office must, in response to this report, set out the process for out-of-country appeals; the steps which will be taken to ensure a fair hearing; and whether this will include appellants being given access to the evidence against them," the report said.
"We will also be insisting that ETS give evidence to the Committee, something they have failed to do in court," it said.
The committee fears a "knee-jerk reaction" by the UK Home Office following the BBC documentary.
The UK Home Office is yet to comment on the latest findings of the report.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
