US judge overturns controversial Texas abortion rule

Image
AFP Chicago
Last Updated : Oct 29 2013 | 6:15 AM IST
A federal judge has overturned a controversial restriction imposed on abortion providers in Texas, deeming it an unconstitutional "undue burden" on women seeking to terminate pregnancies.
The restriction - which was set to go in effect today - was among a host of new rules which critics say would have forced all but five of the sprawling state's 42 clinics to close.
Abortion is a key hot-button issue in US politics. Opponents have in recent years imposed a host of restrictions aimed at deterring women from ending their pregnancies and making it harder for clinics to operate.
The Supreme Court has upheld its 1973 landmark Roe v Wade decision legalizing abortion but has approved of a number of restrictions such as waiting periods and a ban on late-term abortions.
Texas state senator Wendy Davis won national attention with an 11-hour filibuster in June which briefly blocked the controversial bill before it was passed in a special session.
The bill bans all abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, limits the use of the abortion pill RU486, imposes expensive new building codes on clinics, and requires abortion providers to get admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.
Federal judge Lee Yeakel ruled that the admitting privilege requirement "does not bear a rational relationship to the legitimate right of the State in preserving and promoting fetal life or a woman's health and, in any event, places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her."
Similar restrictions imposed in Alabama, Mississippi and Wisconsin were also overturned by federal courts.
Many hospitals ban their physicians from performing abortions and will not grant providers admission privileges because their low-risk practices do not result in a high enough volume of admissions, Yeakel noted in a 26-page opinion.
Limits on the use of the abortion pill were upheld because the law includes a provision which accounts for threats to a woman's health or life, Yeakel ruled. The other restrictions were not addressed in the lawsuit.
Texas Governor Rick Perry vowed to "continue to fight" for the law.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 29 2013 | 6:15 AM IST

Next Story