US national barred from entering India: HC seeks govt's reply

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 30 2018 | 6:20 PM IST
The Delhi High Court has sought the Centre's response on a US national's plea against denial of entry to him in India despite holding a business visa valid till June 2022.
Justice Rajiv Shakdher issued notice to the ministries of External Affairs and Home Affairs and sought their response by March 19 on the petition of Jensen Christopher Martin, who was detained at the Kempegowda International Airport at Bengaluru on January 3 allegedly without being given any reason.
His wife and kids were, however, allowed to enter India, but he was forced to travel to Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia, the US national has said in his plea.
Martin, represented by advocates Robin R David and Dhiraj Philip, has also claimed that when he bought tickets to travel to London from Bengaluru, British Airways refused to let him board the plane unless Malaysian Airlines took responsibility for him if he was denied entry into the United Kingdom.
He was therefore forced to travel to Kuala Lumpur, his plea said and sought the reasons for the action taken against him by the Indian Immigration authorities.
The US national has claimed he has been to India several times in the past on business and this time too, he was here to "promote and train social businesses in Bengaluru" on behalf of his company Global Entrepreneurs.
He has claimed that no reasons were given while detaining him at the airport and deny him entry into the country despite a valid visa, and alleged that he was unlawfully separated from his family.
Martin has sought quashing or revoking of the orders, if any, which barred him from entering India and also compensation for the financial loss incurred by him in purchasing the tickets for travel to Kuala Lumpur.
In his petition, the US national has claimed that barring him from entering India has affected his professional career and dented his international future travel prospects as the "deportation/refusal of entry is likely to be seen internationally as a black mark against him".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 30 2018 | 6:20 PM IST

Next Story