Wells Fargo CEO defends bank in tough Senate hearing

Image
AFP New York
Last Updated : Oct 04 2017 | 1:22 AM IST
Wells Fargo's chief defended the bank's efforts to rectify a massive fake accounts scandal today, but faced tough questioning from senators and at least one call for his ouster.
Chief executive Tim Sloan, who was promoted to the top job in late 2016 after the scandal exploded, again apologized for the debacle, in which the bank opened as many as 3.5 million potentially phony accounts at a time when executives told Wall Street "cross selling" would boost profits.
Sloan reviewed myriad efforts to compensate affected customers, change payment incentives and better train employees.
"Wells Fargo is a better bank today than it was year ago and in a year it will be a better bank than it is today," he pledged.
The session was a follow-up to a hearing last fall in the same committee at which former chief executive John Stumpf endured bruising questions from senators from both parties and a particularly harsh dressing-down from Massachusetts Democrat Elizabeth Warren, who accused the CEO of "gutless leadership."
Stumpf stepped down three weeks after the hearing and was replaced by Sloan, a 30-year Wells veteran who served as chief operating officer when the fake accounts scandal broke.
Warren also went hard after Sloan, telling him he "should be fired" for not doing more to investigate and address the problem as signs of the scandal surfaced.
"At best you were incompetent," she said. "At worst you were complicit."
Sloan defended his response, saying the bank took some "incremental"
actions early on, but misunderstood the depth of the problem.
"I have made mistakes, I haven't been perfect," he said. "The reason I'm the right person is because I have made change for 30 years."
While some Republican lawmakers also expressed astonishment at the scandal, their questions were generally fairly polite.
But Senator Sherrod Brown lambasted Wells Fargo for forcing consumers in many cases into arbitration, a behind- closed-door process that can keep corporate malfeasance from courtroom exposure and that critics say often leaves consumers paying.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 04 2017 | 1:22 AM IST

Next Story