Whole of Delhi is unauthorised: HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 07 2017 | 7:22 PM IST
Entre Delhi is unauthorised, an anguished High Court remarked today while hearing a plea regarding the ongoing demolition at Kathputli colony in west Delhi.
The observation was made by a bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar when an NGO representing some residents of the area said that jhuggis were demolished in violation of the high court's October 31 and November 1 orders.
The high court in its two orders had directed the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) not to demolish the jhuggis of persons who were not eligible for relocation as per the land owning agency.
The NGO has claimed that the directions of the high court were not being strictly complied with by DDA.
It also alleged before the bench that its order yesterday allowing three NGO members to visit the area to identify the slums of people ineligible for relocation was also not followed by the DDA.
A woman activist, who was part of the three member panel, alleged in court that some men at the site misbehaved with her.
Pursuant to the submission, the bench directed the Station House Officer (SHO) of the area to ensure protection to the three-member panel.
The court also reiterated its earlier order that there should be strict compliance of its directions.
With these directions, the bench listed the matter for hearing on November 16.
The court had on October 31 put on hold the demolition at the site for two weeks, but had modified its order the next day by allowing DDA to demolish jhuggis whose residents were eligible for relocation and had voluntarily moved out of the Kathputli colony to the transit camps at Narela and Anand Parbat here.
Spread over an area of around 14 acres, Kathputli Colony was home to a large number of puppeteers, magicians, singers and musicians.
It is the first slum in the city to be taken up by the DDA for in-situ redevelopment with the help of a private developer, who in turn will get a substantial part of land for commercial use as part of the project.
The stay order had come on a PIL filed through advocate Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, on behalf of the residents and an NGO, National Alliance of People's Movement, claiming that the DDA issued a notice on October 25 for vacating the area giving them only four days to move out.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 07 2017 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story