Why can't sites of app-based cab services be blocked: Delhi HC

A PIL alleged that these taxi services were operating despite the government banning them

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-133683230/stock-photo-scales-of-justice-gavel-and-books.html" target="_blank">Gavel</a> image via Shutterstock
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 21 2015 | 1:45 PM IST
Delhi High Court today asked the city government why websites of app-based cabs cannot be blocked on a PIL alleging that these taxi services were operating despite the government banning them.

"Why can't it be done (blocking the sites)? You can block the sites. There is a wing of Delhi Police working on that. You get instructions and file an affidavit," a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S Endlaw said.

The court also issued notice to the Centre, Delhi government and the city police seeking their responses by February 25, the next date of hearing.

Also Read

The petition by Harkesh Gupta, filed through advocate Rajat Sehgal has contended that the January 1 order (banning app-based cabs) of the government is being violated by various app-based cab services which continue to operate and offer their services through their sites.

Delhi government, on the other hand, argued it is taking action against those cabs which were found operating despite the ban by seizing/impounding them.

However, the petition has sought that apart from seizing the cabs, the sites of these companies should also be blocked.

The city government had earlier told the court that the ban on app-based taxi services will continue and vehicles violating it will be seized as per its January 1 order.

The government had passed its order on a representation by US-based cab service provider Uber, pursuant to high court's December 24 order when it had asked the cab company to approach the transport department.

Uber, which works through a mobile app, had challenged the December 8 order of the city government banning Uber and 20 other such companies, including Ola Cabs, from operating in Delhi following the rape of a 27-year-old woman executive on December 5 night by a driver of Uber taxi.

The January 1 order had also said that since Uber operates diesel/petrol run vehicles, it is violating the Supreme Court direction that the All India Tourist Permit cabs in Delhi should run on CNG.

The department, however, had also said that Uber "may apply (for operating) under the modified Radio Taxi Scheme, 2006".

Uber had, on January 6, withdrawn its plea challenging the December order of the government banning it.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 21 2015 | 1:15 PM IST

Next Story