Why no FIR filed in Shopian firing? asks NC

Image
Press Trust of India Srinagar
Last Updated : Mar 06 2018 | 7:30 PM IST
The National Conference today asked for clarification from the Jammu and Kashmir government on why legal action has not been taken in the Shopian firing incident, even after Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti accepted that those killed were civilians.
The Shopian incident on Sunday night, that left six people, including two Lashkar-e-Taiba militants, dead has triggered a controversy, with the Army claiming that the four others killed were also linked to militancy and the state government maintaining that they were civilians.
Commenting on Mehbooba's tweet yesterday accepting the youths killed in the incident as civilians, NC spokesperson Junaid Azim Mattu said the chief minister has not been elected to be a "mute spectator" to civilian killings and express condolences.
"What the people would like to know is why the state government has taken no legal action against the culprits, when it has accepted that the young men were not militants or OGWs (over-ground workers), but innocent civilians.
"She (Mehbooba) is duty-bound to hold the culprits accountable and, if she chooses not to do so, this would be a serious dereliction of her constitutional duties yet again," Mattu said in a statement.
Mattu wondered why an FIR has not been filed and the "errant" troops arrested in view of Mehbooba's admission, terming it "shameless surrender and silence".
Speaking about the state government's statement in the Supreme Court yesterday that Major Aditya does not figure in an FIR in another Shopian firing incident, Mattu said, "Copies of the FIR available locally and visible on social media clearly show Major Aditya's name mentioned in the FIR."
The NC spokesperson asked if the state government has misled the Supreme Court or fudged the FIR in that case to "save its skin and remain in power".
"Mehbooba Mufti, on the floor of the Legislative Assembly, assured the people that she would take that case to a logical conclusion. What logical conclusion is this? Why is the state government's stand being represented in such a shoddy, half-baked and half-hearted manner in the Supreme Court?" Mattu added.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 06 2018 | 7:30 PM IST

Next Story