Why remaining parts of Henderson Brook's report on '62 war no

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 19 2014 | 9:54 PM IST
A day after an Australian journalist made public portions of the classified Henderson Brook's report on the 1962 Sino-India war, BJP today wondered if its remaining parts have not been been made public because its content could have been embarassing for Jawaharlal Nehru government.
"What has been made public is Part-I of the report? It has been reported in the media that pages 112 to 167 are still not known. Is it because these pages contain some material which can be embarrassing to those in power in 1962?," said Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley.
The Defence Ministry had yesterday refrained from commenting on the report, which continues to be officially classified, after it was uploaded on his website by journalist Neville Maxwell.
The leaked report blamed the "Forward Policy" of the Nehru government and army leadership for India's debacle in the war against China.
"Given the report's extremely sensitive nature, which is of current operational value, it is reiterated that the government classified it as a top secret document and, as such, it would not be appropriate to comment on the contents uploaded by Neville Maxwell on the web," it had said.
Pressing the need to make the report public, Jaitley said any society is entitled to learn from past mistakes. He said Maxwell released first 111 pages and urged the government to put out the remaining pages rather than allowing public opinion to be influenced by unauthentic sources.
With the wisdom of hindsight, he said, he was of the opinion that the report's contents could have been made public some decades ago.
The BJP leader blamed Nehru and his "favourite" set of officials for their "flawed" assessment in pursuing the Forward Policy, which sought raising of outposts in areas claimed by China and aggressively patrolling them.
"The opinion of these officials close to the PM had cost this country heavily. The unpreparedness of the armed forces is writ large in the contents of the report. Was a Himalayan blunder of 1962 in fact a Nehruvian blunder?," he said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 19 2014 | 9:54 PM IST

Next Story