About 2,000 activists of Tehreek-i-Labaik Ya Rasool Allah (TLY) and its allied groups staged protests and sit-ins on highway and railway lines in several cities of Pakistan for nearly three weeks, disrupting road and rail traffic.
The protests paralysed the capital Islamabad for about three weeks by occupying the Faizabad interchange, linking Islamabad with the garrison city of Rawalpindi.
They demanded the sacking of Law Minister Zahid Hamid for changes in a law related to the Khatm-i- Nabuwwat (finality of prohpethood) oath in the Elections Act 2017.
There were insinuations about the role of Army in the episode after a video clip surfaced showing a senior Army officer giving money to protesters.
Bajwa, however, rejected any support provided by the military to the protesters.
He said that he will resign if the military was found involved in Faizabad sit-in, The Express Tribune reported.
"The [Faizabad] sit-in reminded me of the Lal Masjid incident and I asked the DG ISI to hold dialogue with the protesters," the report quoted him as saying.
Bajwa was responding to Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz Senator Mushahidullah Khan's question relating to the protest.
Earlier, official sources had said an understanding was reached with protesters with the help of the powerful Army to call off the protest.
Following the agreement and the subsequent resignation of Hamid, TLY chief Khadim Hussain Rizvi ordered his followers all over the country to end the sit-ins and go home.
The agreement lauded efforts of Bajwa for playing key role in peacefully ending the stand-off, which became possible after an important meeting between him and Abassi.
Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui of Islamabad High Court had lashed out at the government and the powerful military for the role assigned to the Army as the "mediator" in striking the deal with the protesters to end their sit-in.
"The court had asked the government to clear the roads and not for an agreement with protesters. What you have done is surrender," the judge told Interior Minister Ahsan Iqbal.
"Who is the Army to play the role of mediator?...Where does the law assign this role to a Major General?" he asked.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
