Woman can't be denied separate house allowance in violence cases

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 31 2017 | 9:08 PM IST
A victim of domestic violence cannot be denied the right to live independently without her husband only because she moved in with her parents, a sessions court has said while quashing a trial court order which had refused to grant her a separate house allowance.
Additional Sessions Judge Lokesh Kumar Sharma asked the magisterial court to decide afresh the woman's plea for Rs 12,000 a month for separate accommodation and said the court should have considered it as socially benevolent to protect such domestic violence victims.
"Mere fact that the woman was or has been residing at her parental house cannot be a valid ground for denial of her right to separate residence...Her parents could not be held responsible for keeping her and her minor child after getting her married," the judge said while allowing her appeal.
The judge said that even if the woman could not place on record any document to show her standard of living during subsistence of her marriage, nothing had prevented the court from assessing an amount for her to maintain a separate house.
"Nothing had prevented the court from taking judicial notice of the prevalent rates of rent in the locality and thereafter to assess the space required for the residence of the appellant and her minor daughter. It should have awarded her some amount towards her alternate accommodation.
"The magistrate should have also considered the fact that this is an act qualifying under the category of 'Socially Benevolent Legislation', brought into effect to save women, who were victims of domestic violence, from starvation and destitution and to restore their status in society to what they were earlier enjoying in their marital homes," the judge said and remanded the matter back to the trial court.
According to the complaint lodged by the woman, she was tortured physically, verbally and emotionally at the hands of her husband after which she filed a complaint against him and sought reliefs under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
The woman, who, along with her minor daughter, was now living with her parents, had also sought entitlement to a separate residence, which was denied by the magisterial court on the ground that she was already living with her parents and there were no documents on record to assess the level of accommodation which she enjoyed in the matrimonial house.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 31 2017 | 9:08 PM IST

Next Story