Researchers found that it is not that younger people are able to remember more than older people but their memories seem better because they retrieve them in higher definition.
Philip Ko of Vanderbilt University in the US, led the research team which focused on visual working memory, a person's ability to briefly retain a limited amount of visual information in the absence of visual stimuli.
The team's examination of why this function is reduced during the course of healthy ageing took the multiple stages of encoding, maintenance, and the retrieval of memorised information into account.
This task consisted of viewing two, three or four coloured dots and memorising their appearance. These dots disappeared, and then after a few seconds the participants were presented with a single dot appearing in one of the memorised colours or a new colour.
The accuracy of their response ('same' or 'different') was considered to reflect how well they memorised the colours. This accuracy of response is referred to as 'behavioural measure'.
Electroencephalographic data was also collected from the participants as they performed the task for a neural measure of their memory capacity.
In other words, during the maintenance stage, both groups stored the same number of items.
The researchers suggest that older adults store the items at a lower resolution than younger adults, resulting in impaired recollection.
Unlike older adults, younger adults may be able to use perceptual implicit memory, a different kind of visual memory, to give them a 'boost' when they are trying to retrieve the stored information.
"We don't know why older adults perform poorly when their neural activity suggests their memory capacity is intact, but we have two leads," Ko said.
"Second, there is emerging evidence from other labs suggesting that the quality of older adults' memories is poorer than younger adults.
"In other words, while older adults might store the same number of items, their memory of each item is 'fuzzier' than that of younger adults," Ko said.
The study appears in the journal Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, published by Springer.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
