The student of a Bareilly school was sent to jail by a local court yesterday after being booked under the controversial Section 66A of the Information Technology(IT) Act and for breach of peace by the Rampur police.
Circle Officer Aley Hassan said in Rampur that the boy had posted comments on Facebook which could incite communal tensions and spoil peace and harmony.
In the post, Khan was targeted on the basis of a provocative remark allegedly made by him that turned out to be 'fake', police said.
He was arrested on Monday on a complaint lodged with the police by the minister's PRO Fasahat Ali Khan Shanu. A team of crime branch sleuths was constituted which nabbed the youth from his residence.
The youth was produced yesterday before Judicial Magistrate Azad Singh who sent him on 14-day remand and a hearing on his bail plea is scheduled for tomorrow.
Azam Khan defended the police action.
"A Class XII student has made objectionable comments against me on FB. Law is enforced with strictness and he has been arrested within 24 hours. Comments were made against me earlier also on FB," Khan told reporters in Lucknow.
BJP state chief Laxmikant Bajpai said that the matter could have been resolved by talking to the student.
However, this isn't the first time that someone has gone to jail in UP over a post deemend objectionable.
In August 2013, Dalit scholar Kanwal Bharti was arrested for a Facebook post against the Samajwadi Party over IAS officer Durga Nagpal's suspension.
In that case as well, the FIR against the writer had been filed by an aide of Azam Khan after the SP leader took offence to it.
"Under what circumtances the student was arrested," she asked.
Shanu said social media should be used to connect, to spread love and to convey your message to others.
"But some people are doing mischief in it. This kind of mischief can turn out to be very costly," he said.
Section 66A (sending false and offensive messages through communication services) of the Information Technology Act is sweeping in its powers--if convicted, a person can be sent to jail for up to three years for sending an e-mail or other electronic message that "causes annoyance or inconvenience".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
