NEW YORK (Reuters) - Barclays Plc won the dismissal on Monday of a Saudi real estate company's $10 billion lawsuit alleging the bank ceased pursuing lease payments due from the Saudi government on military complexes in order to obtain a banking licence.
New York Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos ruled from the bench in dismissing the 2014 lawsuit by the company, Jadawel International, a unit of London-based MBI International Holdings Inc, a Barclays spokesman said.
The lawsuit sought $10 billion in damages for what Jadawel claimed was a fraudulent scheme Barclays hatched to secure the rare Saudi banking licence, selling out Jadawel in the process.
Barclays contended Jadawel's claims were time-barred and that the lawsuit did not establish a fiduciary relationship between Jadawel and the bank.
"We are pleased with the court's ruling," Andrew Smith, a Barclays spokesman, said.
A lawyer for Jadawel did not respond to requests for comment.
MBI, founded by Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber, built two compounds and leased them to the Saudi government in 1999 to house U.S. defence contractors, the lawsuit said. The payments should have totalled over $2 billion through 2017, it said.
When Jadawel sought to refinance in 2001, Barclays helped assemble a group of lenders, the lawsuit said.
In 2002, the government partially defaulted and Barclays assumed responsibility to collect, it said. As a result, Barclays filed a federal lawsuit seeking damages from the Saudi government.
Barclays later caused the lawsuit to be withdrawn, Jadawel's lawsuit said, and sought a bank license from the Saudi Capital Markets Authority, which was considering granting one to a Western financial institution for the first time in decades.
Jadawel accused the bank of dropping the lawsuit and compromising the claims for its own benefit, causing it to be deprived hundreds of millions of dollars in lease payments and sell the compounds at a "substantial loss."
The bank also was reported to have bribed a Saudi prince and government official to help obtain the licence, the lawsuit said.
In 2012, Reuters reported that the U.S. government was investigating whether Barclays paid bribes to win a banking licence in Saudi Arabia. Barclays has denied doing so.
The case is MBI International Holdings v Barclays Bank Plc, New York State Supreme Court, No. 653307/2014.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
