By Kirstin Ridley
LONDON (Reuters) - The U.S. owner of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) will take over the running of Libor in an attempt to restore credibility to the benchmark interest rate rocked last year by a global rigging scandal.
A central cog in the world financial system, Libor rates are used as a reference for some $550 trillion in contracts ranging from complex derivatives to everyday credit card bills. But trust in the London interbank offered rate (Libor) was shaken by revelations that traders had routinely manipulated it, prompting an overhaul of the system by which it is calculated.
NYSE Euronext will take over Libor from the British Bankers' Association (BBA) for a token 1 pound. The BBA, a trade body, had since the 1980s administered the rate, which reflects what banks say they are charged to borrow by other banks.
The focus for NYSE Euronext will be on restoring credibility and integrity to Libor and ensuring it remains one of the most important global rates, a source close to the situation said, adding that since Libor underpinned the interest rate trading market it was vital to the exchange's own banking and brokerage customers.
London is not losing oversight of the benchmark that bears its name, as the rate will continue to be regulated for the time being by Britain's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
Tuesday's decision to award the administration of Libor to NYSE Euronext from early 2014 was taken by an advisory committee appointed in October by the UK finance ministry to find a successor to the BBA.
Martin Wheatley, chief executive of the FCA, which started regulating Libor this April after escalating public and political outrage at the scandal, called the appointment "an important step in enhancing the integrity of Libor".
But with uncertainty about the future regulation of Libor - and given NYSE Euronext is being bought by U.S. peer IntercontinentalExchange (ICE) for $8.2 billion - not everyone was convinced by the appointment.
"We had a 'fox guarding the henhouse' issue here, and we should learn from that," said Bart Chilton, a member of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulator.
Chilton added: "I firmly believe that having a truly neutral third-party administrator would be the best alternative, and I'm not sure that an exchange is the proper choice."
STRONG GOVERNANCE
NYSE Euronext did not say in its statement how it would address such concerns, but the source close to the situation said it would involve "a very strong governance and oversight regime". This would based around an oversight committee and involve a code of conduct "to ensure there is no repeat of what we've seen in the last few years", the source added.
British and U.S. regulators have so far fined three banks -Barclays Plc , UBS AG and RBS - a total of $2.6 billion and two men have been charged for manipulating Libor and similar benchmark rates. But more banks and individuals remain under investigation.
Thomson Reuters , parent of Reuters which has calculated Libor and distributed the rates on behalf of the BBA since 2005, had also expressed an interest in a role in running Libor, another source said.
The company said it would continue as calculator and distributor of Libor unless NYSE Euronext decides otherwise.
The FCA's Wheatley had first recommended changes to how the benchmark was set, governed and supervised last September.
But Libor remains in flux.
The U.S. CFTC wants it scrapped and replaced with a reference rate based on actual market transactions, while Wheatley argues that a rapid transition to a transaction-only rate is not possible.
Meanwhile, Brussels is also seeking to take on powers held by national regulators. According to an EU law to be proposed shortly, regulation of major benchmarks like Libor and oil indexes - also at the centre of rigging allegations - could be shifted from London to the Paris-based European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).
In an effort to bridge the gap between British and U.S. views, the IOSCO group of securities regulators will later this month propose final principles on the governance of benchmarks, which will be reflected in the upcoming EU draft law.
According to a document seen by Reuters, it will recommend using market transactions, but will allow for estimates when markets are illiquid. Trading had dried up between banks at the height of the 2007-2008 credit crunch, making it difficult to calculate accurate interbank rates. (Additional reporting by Steve Slater, Matt Scuffham and Clare Hutchison; Editing by Alexander Smith and David Holmes)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
