Rajaratnam, Gupta seek to void U.S. insider trading penalties

Image
Reuters NEW YORK
Last Updated : Mar 10 2015 | 10:22 AM IST

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Galleon Group hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam and former Goldman Sachs Group Inc director Rajat Gupta are seeking to overturn penalties imposed against them for insider trading, citing a recent U.S. court decision that narrowed the definition of that offence.

Rajaratnam, who is serving an 11-year prison term, is trying to void a $92.8 million penalty in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission civil case, while Gupta wants to throw out his criminal conviction, which led to a two-year prison term, according to court filings late last week.

The men are the highest-profile defendants convicted in a U.S. insider trading crackdown, focused mainly on hedge funds, unveiled in 2009.

Rajaratnam, 57, was convicted of fraud and conspiracy over a variety of trades that prosecutors said generated $63.8 million of illegal profit. Gupta, 66, who is also a former McKinsey & Co global managing director, was convicted of passing tips to Rajaratnam about Goldman's financial results and an investment from Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc .

But in seeking lesser punishments, both men cited a Dec. 10 ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York that overturned two insider trading convictions.

That court said insider trading required knowledge that insiders who passed confidential tips did so in exchange for personal benefits "of some consequence."

In a filing late on Friday night with the 2nd Circuit, Rajaratnam said his criminal case, which was the basis of the SEC penalty, involved several transactions in which he "had no knowledge of a benefit conferred upon the tipper."

Gupta, meanwhile, told his trial judge Jed Rakoff on March 5 that jurors never found that his tips were "part of an agreed upon exchange of tips for consequential benefits, resulting in his conviction for conduct that is not a crime."

Jennifer Queliz, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment. SEC spokesman John Nester also declined to comment.

The cases are SEC v. Rajaratnam, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 11-5124; and U.S. v. Gupta, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-cr-00907.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Tom Brown)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 10 2015 | 10:13 AM IST

Next Story