Reducing inequality would boost economic growth- OECD

Image
Reuters PARIS
Last Updated : Dec 09 2014 | 9:09 PM IST

PARIS (Reuters) - Moves by national governments to reduce inequality between their rich and poor citizens would help to lift economic growth, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development said on Tuesday.

The Paris-based think tank wrote in a report that high income inequality had a "negative and statistically significant impact" on growth as a widening gap between rich and poor often concealed falling income for all but the richest groups.

"The single biggest impact on growth is the widening gap between the lower middle class and poor households compared to the rest of society," it wrote in a report based on 30 years of harmonised data from developed and highly developed countries.

"It follows that policies to reduce income inequalities should not only be pursued to improve social outcomes but also to sustain long-term growth."

To reduce inequality, countries should invest in education and redistribute wealth through taxes and other transfers, it added. It said it found no evidence that redistributive policies harmed growth if they were well designed and implemented.

The economic impact of inequality has been in the spotlight this year after a best-selling book by French economist Thomas Piketty which argued that the gap between rich and poor has been widening for decades in the West.

The OECD said that, over the past two decades up to the global slowdown of 2009, the cumulative growth rate would have been 6-9 percentage points higher in Italy, Britain and the United States had income disparities there not widened.

Conversely, greater levels of equality were helping boost Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in Spain, France and Ireland before the crisis.

In most developed nations the gap between rich and poor reached its highest level in 30 years in 2014, with the top 10 percent of the population earning 9.5 times the income of the poorest 10 percent, the OECD wrote.

The gap had been widening since the 1980s, when the richest segment earned seven times as much as the poorest.

However, the biggest negative impact on growth was not from rising top incomes but a widening gap between low income households and the rest of the population, it said.

(Reporting By Nicholas Vinocur; editing by Mark John)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 09 2014 | 8:59 PM IST

Next Story