Southwest Airlines to pay $15 million to settle price collusion lawsuit

Image
Reuters
Last Updated : Jan 05 2018 | 5:15 AM IST

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - Southwest Airlines Inc agreed to pay $15 million to settle nationwide antitrust litigation by passengers who accused the four largest U.S. carriers of conspiring to raise fares by reducing seating capacity.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C. granted preliminary approval on Wednesday for the accord with the Dallas-based carrier.

Southwest denied wrongdoing but said it settled to avoid the cost and distraction of further litigation.

It is the first defendant to settle and agreed to help the plaintiffs with their case against the remaining defendants, which are American Airlines Group Inc , Delta Air Lines Inc and United Continental Holdings Inc .

Those carriers have also denied wrongdoing. The litigation began in 2015 after the U.S. Department of Justice began probing possible collusion. It has yet to take any formal action.

The passenger litigation combined more than 100 private lawsuits filed around the country.

Passengers claimed that the airlines' collusion began in early 2009, led to higher fares and reduced flight choices, and together with low fuel prices and higher fees for checking bags and other services helped the industry post record profits.

According to government data, American, Delta, Southwest and United together commanded a roughly 69 percent share of the U.S. domestic air travel market from October 2016 to September 2017.

In statements on Thursday, American spokesman Matt Miller said, "We will continue to defend against the claims, which we believe are without merit," while Delta spokesman Morgan Durrant said, "The simple fact is that Delta has not engaged in any illegal behaviour."

United was not immediately available for comment.

Kollar-Kotelly called Southwest's settlement "sufficiently fair, reasonable and adequate" to justify preliminary approval.

Final approvals typically occur a few months after preliminary approvals are granted and after people are given a chance to object.

The case is In re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 15-mc-01404.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 05 2018 | 5:02 AM IST

Next Story