By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - Yahoo Inc owes a prize promoter $5.5 million for backing out of a contract to pay $1 billion for predicting every winner in the 2014 NCAA men's basketball tournament, and entering a similar contract with Quicken Loans Inc and Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc , a court decided on Monday.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans said SCA Promotions Inc was entitled to half of its $11 million contract with Yahoo as a cancellation penalty.
It rejected Yahoo's claim that Dallas-based SCA improperly leaked the promotion to Buffett and Berkshire, while trying to line up insurance coverage for the grand prize.
Berkshire is well-known for insuring against potentially costly events with long odds, such as picking a perfect "March Madness" bracket, as the National Collegiate Athletic Association tournament is known.
"Any information that SCA disclosed to Berkshire Hathaway was not confidential information," Circuit Judge Edith Brown Clement wrote for a three-judge panel.
Because SCA had kept Yahoo's $1.1 million deposit, the appeals court on Monday awarded it another $4.4 million.
The decision reversed a lower court ruling ordering SCA to return $550,000 of the deposit to Yahoo.
"It has been a long battle over what we thought was a simple contractual provision," Jon Patton, a lawyer for SCA, said in an interview. "We're pleased the court of appeals got this right."
Verizon Communications Inc bought Yahoo's internet business in June, and put it in a unit called Oath.
Charles Stewart, an Oath spokesman, said the unit does not discuss litigation.
Berkshire and Quicken announced their "Billion Dollar Bracket Challenge" three weeks after Yahoo and SCA signed their contract, and Yahoo quickly agreed to co-sponsor it.
No one won the top prize.
Berkshire now sponsors a bracket contest for its roughly 368,000 employees.
This year, a West Virginia factory worker won $100,000 for correctly choosing winners of the tournament's first 29 games.
The case is SCA Promotions Inc v Yahoo Inc, 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 15-11254.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Tom Brown)
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
