As per Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962, for interest payment, the time limit of three months kicks in when the order for refund is made. For expeditious processing of refund claims, detailed instructions can be found in Chapter 14 of the CBEC Customs Manual, which deal with receipt and acknowledgement of all refund applications, processing of refund applications and their disposal, issue of cheque within three days of the order, audit, instructions of the Chief Vigilance Commissioner and monitoring mechanism. The CBEC Citizen's Charter says that the department will dispose of a refund claim within three months of receipt of a complete claim. In case that does not happen in practice, you may take up your grievance with the appropriate authorities as detailed in Chapter 32 of the CBEC Customs Manual.
We have three R&D units, each with a separate registration under service tax laws. We have Cenvat Credit balances in these units. We now intend to centralise the accounts and take centralised registration covering the activities in all three units. Can we utilise the balances that are available at the three units for discharge of service tax liability at the centralised office?
Rules 10, 10A and 12 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 cover various situations when Cenvat Credit can be transferred from one unit/premises to the other. Rule 10 (2) deals with a situation where a provider of output service shifts or transfers his business on account of a change in ownership or on account of sale, merger, amalgamation, lease or transfer of the business to a joint venture, with the specific provision for transfer of liabilities of such business. Rule 10A deals with transfer of unutilised Cenvat credit of additional duty leviable under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1985. Rule 12A (4) deals with transfer of Cenvat Credit available with one of his registered manufacturing premises or premises providing taxable service to his other such registered premises by a large tax payer. Your case does not appear to fall in any of these Rules.
Do we need to pay excise duty on the embossing of aluminium foil?
In the case of GTC Industries Ltd. [2011 (266) ELT 160 (Bom.)], it was held that when duty paid aluminium foil is subjected to the process of embossing/cutting to shape, the resultant product does not emerge as a distinct marketable commodity and hence no excise duty is leviable on such a product.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
