G'Nut Oil Improves, Sugar Firms, Bullion Divergent

Image
BSCAL
Last Updated : Jun 15 1999 | 12:00 AM IST

The textile committee report on the survey conducted for evaluation of allotment of quota under the Powerloom Exporters Entitlement (PEE) system has dismissed the claims of the powerloom sector for higher quota allocation. The report called for a complete overhaul of the system, incorporating a non-transferability clause. It also called for legal provisions to apprehend the offenders.

"The PEE system is not being utilised effectively. There are very few clubber shippers in relation to the actual number of allottees. Even from among these few, only about 50 per cent were found to have actually exported. The exports were mostly made in one or two categories and in a number of cases, the exported quantities were less than the clubbed quantities," observed the report on the survey which was restricted to clubber shippers for 1997 and 1998.

The team also detected the non existence of units at the declared addresses in several cases. It found that PEE quota was being sold under the guise of clubbing. "It was reported by some units that blank application forms for clubbing were signed and handed over to the agents," the report noted.

The survey noticed that none of the clubbees were contributing any export goods. Most exporters sourced export goods from outside and did not disclose the status of the suppliers.

The survey found that for the year 1997, of the 208 clubber shippers, only 101 units had actually exported and during 1998, of the 148 clubber shippers, only 81 units had exported. Moreover, of the 101 units who had exported in 1997, 75 had exported only one category, 20 in 2 categories, 5 in 3 categories and 1 unit had exported 4 categories. Similarly, during 1998, out of 81 units to have exported, 52 had exported 1 category; 18 exported 2 categories, 7 in 3 categories, 2 in 4 categories and 2 units exported in 5 categories.

The report revealed that as many as 26 units had exported less than the clubbed quantities during 1997 while 37 units had done so in 1998. Further, only 23 units had reportedly sourced goods from SSI units during 1997 while only 7 had sourced from SSI units in the subsequent year.

The textile committee report pointed out that the benefits under the PEE system were not reaching the decentralised small scale powerloom sector and the gains were mainly enjoyed by middlemen who are neither manufacturers nor exporters.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 15 1999 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story