Greens See Red Over Fund Allocations

Image
BSCAL
Last Updated : Apr 01 1998 | 12:00 AM IST

On the eve of the first ever meet of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) assembly, environmentalists have voiced resentment against the meagre allotments to Indian environmental projects.

They are particularly critical of the quantum of funds earmarked for the pilot eco-development project, which is meant to benefit the local population living around seven national parks.

The GEF and the World Bank has earmarked $ 68 million (Rs 265 crore). Environmentalists say this is a paltry amount as the allocation is for a three-year period.

Also Read

They say the target beneficiaries will receive Rs 10,000 per year. This is a ridiculous amount in lieu of the fact that will be giving up their right on the minor forest produce, their only source of livelihood, they add.

According to The Centre for Science and Environment, a Delhi-based non-government organisation, the project is impractical and expensive and goes against the basic rights of indigenous communities.

The fund thus works out to Rs 10,000 a year in terms of the target beneficiaries. This is a ridiculous amount because in lieu therefore the people will have to give up their rights on the minor forest produce which is their only source of livelihood.

The Centre for Science and Environment, a Delhi-based non-government organisation (NGO) goes as far as to say that the eco-development project is impractical and expensive, going against the basic rights of the indigenous communities in India.

Environmentalists are outraged over the fact that neither the GEF, World Bank or the government has come forward to react to their grievances on the issue.

In fact, they say, the issue went unanswered during a meeting on Sunday, when representatives from over 100 international and national NGOs, the GEF secretariat, GEF council, and implementing agencies were present.

They say the plight of the local communities in other countries is no different, as revealed during the meet.

According to them, Grace Akumu from the Climate Action Network, Nairobi, referred to the forced resettlement of the Pokamo people living inside the Tana Forest Reserve.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 01 1998 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story