Panel Unsure Of Plan Review Approach

Image
Saibal Das Gupta BSCAL
Last Updated : Jun 23 1998 | 12:00 AM IST

Planning Commission experts, who have been asked to revise the final draft of the Ninth Plan, are in the dark on whether the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government wants to retain the approach paper that was approved by the National Development Council (NDC) during the United Front regime.

The experts are going through the process of revising the Ninth Plan based on the National Agenda of Governance (NAG) of the ruling coalition as they have been asked to do by the government.

Revision of the Plan would require a reassessment of the resource situation and a review of the very approach to the Plan.

"Normally, a new government at the Centre would want to revise the approach to a five-year Plan. Some of the state governments, which endorsed the approach in the NDC, have also changed. But there is no word from the government on this issue," a plan panel expert said.

One reason why the government is not rushing to change the approach is the delicate balance of power in the coalition ministry and the difficulties involved in getting approval of all the chief ministers to a new approach if the NDC is convened to approve it.

The recent political turmoil in Tamil Nadu over the issue of raising electricity charges for farmers was a pointer to this fact. The Ninth Plan draft has recommended raising the charges paid by farmers because the low rates are coming in the way of reviving state electricity boards, which has also affected the growth of the private power producers.

The focus on the NAG is to increase public investments in infrastructure and social sector. This will mean a further increase in outlays for these sectors.

But economic sanctions imposed by the United States and consequent downgrading of India's sovereign rating by Moody's has thrown up a new dimension. Plan panel experts are concerned that it may not be possible to increase public investments in certain sectors if external assistance is reduced or shut off.

At another level, the government's insistence to keep fiscal deficit under check is a major stumbling block in the commission's efforts to increase public investments in several areas.

The National Thermal Power Corporation has planned some major projects on the assumption that the Overseas Economic Co-peration Fund (OECF) of Japan will fund it. But OECF has made it clear that it will not be possible to fund future projects in view of economic sanctions imposed by the government of Japan.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 23 1998 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story