The working group set up to recast the Companies Act is reported to have proposed penalising companies and the investors from giving and accepting gifts at the annual general meetings. The proposal is meaningless as it amounts to undue interference in the affairs of the Companies of their shareholders.
It is true that not all companies give gifts. But why should the government prevent those who give to their own shareholders any gift? After all, lakhs are spent every month by the companies for giving donations etc.
There are companies which do not give any dividend for a number of years. The poor shareholders who attend the AGM are given some of their products. Why should anyone object to this? After all, isnt all this the shareholders money?
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
