The multinationals stand to gain due to two reasons: One, the Indian government has asked the companies to pay only the tax and has offered to withdraw the interest and penalty component. Second, with the Indian currency losing value against the US dollar and the British pound, the actual payout from the foreign firms would be lesser by another 20 per cent.
Citing an example, a tax lawyer said when Vodafone was slapped with a Rs 10,000 crore tax bill, the Indian currency was around Rs 80 to a pound but now the rupee has depreciated to Rs 100 to a pound which has bought its tax bill down. “For example, Vodafone's tax bill in British currency has come down from 1.25 billion pounds to around one billion pounds, “a tax lawyer – advising one of the MNCs – said, asking not to be quoted. An official Vodafone statement said they are "studying the proposal , while continuing to seek resolution of this matter through international arbitration." The matter is currently under arbitration.
The company claimed it has always maintained that there was no tax to pay at the time it completed its acquisition of Hutchison's business in 2007. It asserted that this view was upheld unanimously by the Supreme Court of India in January 2012, and that Vodafone was the acquirer in the transaction and made no capital gain whatsoever. Given the clarity of the Indian law in force in 2007, there was no legal basis to withhold tax.
“These companies are likely to settle the cases not because they think the scheme is fair but because they are tired of litigation in India and want to go ahead with their lives,” said he.
In many cases, the amount of interest and penalty is now more than the tax amount itself. “This (offer) can help restore confidence of international investors and would be a serious statement of commitment to reduce litigation and conveying a message that we have a tax regime that “listens”. This will help us bury the ghost of retrospective amendments which have tarnished India’s image with global investors,” said Suresh Surana, founder of RSM Astute Consulting Group.
Vodafone is already engaged in arbitration with the government of India in the case of a taxation claim for a transaction the company completed in 2007, in which it bought out Hutchison's 67 per cent stake in its telecom joint venture in India for about $11 billion. As the deal was signed abroad, Hutchison did not pay any tax. The Indian income tax department later asked Vodafone to pay the tax. Vodafone moved the Supreme Court and won the case but the Indian government came out with a retrospective tax legislation which taxed all such transactions signed earlier. After many of these MNCs including Shell, Cairn PLC were slapped with notices, they moved the courts. Shell later won a reprieve from the Bombay High Court.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)